The stars described as involved in such a scandal were subject to the headlines in a very negative portrayal of their lives, lifestyles, and intentions. These figures are and were beloved by many. Many were accustomed to seeing these figures in headlines for primarily good, praiseworthy, causes.

Such typical press surrounding them were often linked enjoyable content, projects, businesses, inspiration, and cultural impact that shaped many lives for the better. 

When associated to a 2019 scandal, these figures were described as "so powerful" and elite, but in many instances the population can better connect with their sacrifices and stories that have shaped their respective lives. This ranges from their personal stories, to the stories on screen that positively impacted individuals for inspiration, laughs, entertainment, motivation, and forms of purpose. 

Some business professionals even subject to such seemingly harsh consequences took risks at the time they were in the college-age and demographic for their businesses to prosper and eventually gain the influenced granted over the years. 

In context to described expenses, many of the developments that could influence their perspective to pushing their children's lives forward are numerous. Particular knowledge they obtain for not being nearly as involved in particular environments can be seen as understandable. This is given their elevated roles in other industries, and personal interests far outside of these educational spaces to deserve the level of scrutiny and severe consequences. 

Therefore, if such stars can be perceived as privileged, powerful, and actually placed in criminal facilities, for widely perceived minuscule and uninformed measures that they may have understood to be reasonable steps to improve their own personal circumstances regarding lives they support, then the severity of those with proven negative impact, incredible influence over these spaces and intention of their companies and conspirers is profound. 

These figures were seemingly dragged with the perception of having deceived funds and associated to a  scheme, (regarding industries that may not overlap as directly with their businesses) lacking extensive tools, technology, or prior history with such activity. Some of their consequences can be called into question.

Big Tech can be proven to be certain in their efforts to intentionally conspire, and have far more control over processes and people linked more directly with the environments that other individuals faced harsh penalty for accused misuse of their efforts to support their family.

Further, these companies, founders, and contributors to their system have far more lengthier track-records of committing intentional acts of deception, breaches, and causing detriment in a variety of schemes even beyond institutions and to international demonstrations. They have been called and collectively listed and testifying to Anti Trust probes, with proven problematic impact to many spaces. 

As the actual elite professionals are Big Tech enterprises (that have various forms of direct influence over institutions) continue to carry on with their intent, that can originate on the internet, but impact individuals in digital and physical means through extensive expenditure and coordination, they are very deserving of time.

Many of the incredible mogul parents and "millionaire" (not even the billionaire bosses of tech companies directly controlling everyone) families were accused of actions and resource allocation that are largely seen as naive and admirable steps to increase the odds of their children experiencing and accessing these elite institutions. 

In many instances, they themselves were victims of a scheme-like sharing of an opportunity, that could prompt individuals (not as invested in these spaces) to be motivated to take an interest in having their children have the chance to enroll. Some of the institutions listed in the described scheme (including the most applied to school in the nation) were already in hign demand that any parent could jump at measures to increase their likelihood of attendance. 

Parents invest in various forms of schooling, programs, summer curriculum, tutors, curricular activities, and even purchse chances to have access and advantages to programs to live or study on campuses (prior to attendance, acceptance, or enrollment) for those that can afford to increase these experiences for their children.

Further, the unfortunate headlines and harsh measures different stars were subject to, misrepresented the motivation particularly of involvement given these realities. As personal engagements and perceived relationships that assist in the awareness of unfamiliar institutions for parents seeking prospective opportunity, is common. 

The reasonable response to the described purchases for the betterment of understanding and familiarity to such environments, could be seen as rather fair for those that may not be alumnus, active, and apart of a culture/company far more associated to these institutions (as many Big Tech founders, employees, and elite investors are).

Additionally, there are privileged parents that invest more in funds for dedicated to the personal expense of education purposes for their children. There are even private schools that have tuition sometimes more expensive than colleges themselves, for the awareness and culture that set these students up for elite environments and institutions in demand, with increased likelihood they gain more access as a result.

Big Tech has extensive knowledge and power within these environments, with the growing ability to dictate activity (detrimental), agendas, and aid in a variety of demonstrations from institutions and beyond. These companies can purchase other companies, deploy extensive resources (financial, digital, physical) to enhance restlessness amongst their targets.

They have been proven in many scenarios to have compromised the data of users, altered and skewed with data and technology to harrass targets, and influence individuals. 

They have been proven in scenarios to operate as a collective, and scheme with their ability and tools to communicate amongst each other for the intention of intimidation. From expenses linked to Ad placements (digital and physical) with the intent and deceptive nature of collaborating in such a schematic purpose to cause detriment to others, their intent is heavily found in their purposes and spending.

They have under their possessions and platforms, the power to influence entire institutions with intent to terrorize and manipulate distinct users, access data amongst specified populations and demographics, and access activity in their platforms for practices used and intended to be conducted in a predatory manner.

They have purchasing power to acquire companies, companions, apps, software, to harass people through tools (human and digital), while also dictating access to particular environments that aim and can seemingly control. They have proven to do so, and particular users even from the institutions they can influence (in chats that originate in elite university environments) have been subject to digital tactics, attacks, cyber and physical intimidation attempts, as a result of their expenditure.

They also have a larger understanding of both the networks of students, alumnus, and staff at these institutions particularly, with their direct funding and tools that have been subject to many breaches, targeting, and intentions of detriment with their power and purchases. 

Given how much control and a footprint big-tech has over these campuses anyway, many are under the impression to not rule out settlements to the passionate parents unfortunately used as posters, when predatory companies have far more practices and dictation to be detrimental and deceptive in these environments. 

These companies seemingly have little or no problem with manipulated students gravitating towards their platforms, promoting particular agendas and alterations that come along with those they target and recruit as tools. 

They condition many to seemingly rely and contribute (slave) to their services. 

However, for others are punished for their described participation in an opportunity, that cannot even match the Big Tech interest, investment, influence, income, and intentionality of controlling these collegiate environments.

Particularly regarding the described students associated to a 2019 scheme (in which they can still be seen as fit and eligible for these institutions), they also faced unfortunate and extensive criticism for their attendance.

In regards to their presence, and the more direct coincidental appearances and alignment that Big Tech founders have to respective institutions, they face limited criticism for the business and data conflicts, incentives, investments,  that can influence and dictate control as they make themselves, services, and in similar ways their own children present in these elite institutions. 

In many scenarios, children of notable professionals and stars face their own elements of circumstances, that contribute to what their presence brings, and in some cases reasonable measures are taken by parents to support their heightened attention should it find them in new environments they are set to enter. 

In many cases, these described children of stars were good people, unproblematic, and welcomed in the spaces as they aren't negatively or intending to come in such spaces with intent to control, showcase agendas, or gain additional insight on the peers, professors, and future workforce despite what comes along with being educated. 

Many of these students subject to unfair criticism, and were more welcomed and preferred opposed to the presence, impact, and invest of what other companies influence over these environments.

Through more elite (Big Tech) companies, founders and their practices, that can be deceptive to the control they gain from donations, investments, and opportunities, they actually leave impressions among students and the demographic far more, and in many cases negatively should it come with the conditioning and comparisons for others that aren't subject to these strategic rewards. 

As these company's scholastic recipients soar in from the heights they define, so does even expenditure linked to the eagles these companies employ that can arguably be placed within spaces promoting agendas. Some students were very surprised and shocked with the presentation of drag queens on screen blasted to the demographic, with personal advocation and encouragement regarding such engagement at a very elite and in-demand institution. Many would see this presence, placement, and purchase power through employing and placing in such environments as far more problematic.

With examples beyond the described, these companies can dictate decisions, dig through data, deploy personnel, and dedicate time and resources to attract to their platforms, but particular students were seen unfairly as problematic.

Many in this instance can see these Big Tech companies as deserving extreme consequences, with the deceptive nature of how they help & aid, but really humiliate & showcase agendas.

As these stars received such harsh punishment and criticism, for their children's advancement in opportunity, the surprising nature of many of the described details of the scheme present unfair assessment of reasonable selection processes that could still enable eligibility. 

Some of the described benefitting roles were that surrounding sports, and the claims many of these students were not great enough to be considered for rewarding their athletic achievement.

In the world of sports, recruiting, and assessing talent this can vary depending upon the institution, program, sport, methods of showcasing, and what can be observed in a given space at particular events.

In the modern world, many of the talent can be found from what can be discovered through content, so it is not surprising if children of content pioneers and accomplished in that area know how to best reflect their children in content (if applicable) while also supporting institutions they are exploring 

In any instance, these particular students are more likely and legitimate in such purposes in comparison to other sponsoring and schemes of elite companies, with deception linked to many events causing detriment beyond institutions.

Sports are actually a good activity for the wellbieing, and there are various perspective surrounding talent and the timing of when talent can develop. Particularly, with some of the described team sports (Ex. rowing), one couldn't completely diminish some of the criticized students' talent and contribution to be a fitting addition to such clubs and programs at institutions. 

In recent history, years, and sports culture we have seen a variety of talent be classified as late bloomers (when they peak towards the latter years entering adulthood). In other cases, associated to scouting, some individuals have the body, tactics, mind, and components that stand out more for their potential than early performance.

There are MVPs that of the professional US basketball association, that were relatively unknown, unpopular, and under-developed early in their recruitment (from language-barriers, athleticism, skill, chemistry predictions, and star potential). Many components factor into projections, and the flawed projections that can come with assessing eligible candidates of such colleges, and the various programs. 

There have been recent US Grand Slams, featuring two young female finalists, some that never reach such a milestone again, but have a showcasing that allows for them to gain attention, sponsors, and opportunity to further their ambition as an athlete. However, a single couple of weeks' performance was necessary for them to be displayed and match a good performance for particular doors to then open.

Some talent embraces support from their direct network, if that is available. Particularly, with the referenced finalists (of college-years/age), they showcased talent in an environment where many would consider the traditional or well-known talent as absent.

Given these passionate star parents received such penalties and prosecution efforts, so much more measures, time, and consequences are expected amongst Big Tech companies.

Big Tech and their appointed contributors to their conspiring, expenditure, sponsoring, and deceptive nature of activity to scheme and suppress the peace and opportunity of others.

Particularly, Big Tech are known to have such an eagerness to eavesdrop on everything, coming with evil intent for those who excel (at such elite institutions), which prompt them purposefully invoking measures to place pain upon their targets as a proven collective.  

They have been proven in many cases to be far more illegitimate and abuse their platforms, pockets, people, privacy of others with predatory agendas and activities that display the intent to deceive and cause detriment by physical and digital means.

These Big Tech companies deserve time, and deserve to be thrown The Book. They need to have the chains linked, and their shipped to fulfill their sentenced penalties, far more severe and structured to the magnitude of their manpower, manipulation, money, and mobilizing.